Is Higher Precision Always Better? Weighing Precision Against Power Consumption
Precision is not something to maximise. Higher precision usually means higher power consumption, a stronger dependency on the correction link and a higher cost, so it has to be matched to the job. Start by putting the accuracy the result actually needs next to the battery life you can accept, then decide the terminal configuration, the power supply and the reporting rate.
Precision is not the goal: fix the accuracy the result needs first
Precision is a means, not the objective. What a job actually needs is the accuracy of the delivered result — the accuracy level the data handed over has to reach. Once that is fixed, you can judge how high the positioning accuracy has to be, whether a centimetre-level fixed solution is needed and how long a convergence time is acceptable, and only then decide which terminal tier to use.
Raising precision raises the cost of several things at the same time: a module with more channels and more frequency bands, a stricter antenna and RF chain, a permanently online differential correction link, and more computing power and longer run time on the terminal side. All of that turns into a higher purchase cost and a higher power draw. The selection logic is therefore usually: satisfy the required accuracy first, then subtract on the power supply and consumption side, rather than the other way round.
Three issues that come up in the field
01
Over-configuration
Running high precision across every scenario pushes cost and power consumption up together. A centimetre-level fixed solution has to receive differential corrections continuously and keep tracking multiple constellations, so the module, the RF chain and the communication link stay under heavy load for long periods, and both the purchase cost and the power draw rise.
02
Insufficient endurance
Frequent reporting and continuous differential correction drain the battery. The higher the update rate and the more frequent the reporting, the higher the duty cycle of the RF and 4G links, and endurance shortens noticeably on the same battery capacity.
03
Heat and stability
Running at high load for a long time affects stability. Continuous heavy load raises the temperature of the unit, and long outdoor shifts can bring risks such as throttling or positioning status fluctuation, which ends up affecting the quality of the result.
Precision and power consumption have to be assessed on one common set of operating parameters: only by looking at the required accuracy, the update rate, the reporting rate and the power supply together can you tell whether the configuration is over-specified.
Current product models (checked 20260929): handheld H13 (all-constellation, multi-frequency professional RTK handheld terminal, Pro tier only) / H11 (single-BeiDou, dual-frequency and Pro versions; overseas H11 ProEU for Europe and H11 ProEN for North America; brand name “BeiDou Xingtan”); module MG20 (RTK customizable PCBA); antennas SK6640 / SK6608. The H11 Pro and H13 share the same module (1408 channels, NebulasIV).
How to balance precision and power consumption in three steps
01
Fix the accuracy you need, then the reporting rate
If the result only has to be metre-level to sub-metre, there is no need to pay the differential and power cost of a centimetre-level fixed solution all year round; if centimetre level really is required, choose the model by the convergence time you can accept, and set reporting to the lowest rate that satisfies the result.
02
Then decide the power supply
Battery capacity, charging method and backup power. Size the battery and the charging method against the length of a shift, the charging opportunities and the work cycle, and add a backup battery or vehicle power if needed, so that precision does not cost you a full day of working capacity.
03
Finally decide the operating mode
High precision on demand, low consumption the rest of the time. Enable high precision and differential correction during the working period, and lower the reporting rate or enter standby outside it; balance the two with the operating mode rather than by stacking configuration.
Frequently asked questions
Does higher precision always cost more?
Usually it does. Higher precision means a module with more channels and more frequency bands, a stricter antenna and RF chain, and a denser differential and communication load, so both the purchase cost and the running power consumption go up. The MG20 and the H13 / H11 Pro use the 1408-channel NebulasIV platform, so they are more precise and correspondingly cost and consume more.
How can power consumption be reduced?
Enable high precision on demand and lower the reporting rate. As long as the required accuracy is met, set the update rate and the reporting rate to what is sufficient; confirm the exact settings with the project, and there is no need to run at the maximum.
How should endurance be estimated?
Assess it per project by reporting rate, link type and temperature environment. With the same battery capacity, behaviour differs with the update rate, the differential link (NTRIP / radio / MQTT backhaul) and temperature, so it is better to assess it in the field with the actual working configuration than to rely on the nominal figure alone.